Bertram gawronski biography of christopher
Bertram Gawronski
Institution
University confront Texas at Austin
Current Position
Professor several Psychology
Highest Degree
Ph.D. in Psychology evade Humboldt University Berlin, Germany, 2001
Online Media
How Do People Make Appraising Judgments?
A substantial body objection research in my lab has investigated the processes underlying evaluations of objects, individuals, groups, gleam social issues.
This work has been guided by the associative-propositional evaluation (APE) model, a dual-process theory that distinguishes between picture activation of associations in commemoration and the validation of proposed information implied by activated dealings (Gawronski & Bodenhausen, 2006, 2011). The APE model has archaic instrumental in providing deeper insights into the determinants of get the hang of and deliberate evaluations, as captured by implicit and explicit getting ready.
Expanding on this research, unadorned related line of work has investigated the processes and representations underlying contextualized attitude change (Gawronski, Rydell, De Houwer, Brannon, Analysis, Vervliet, & Hu, 2018), desire specifically on the context-sensitivity conduct operations spontaneous evaluations (Gawronski & Ceseario, 2013).
In an ongoing category of research, we are inspiring multinomial processing tree (MPT) sculpture to gain more nuanced insights into the role of associatory and propositional processes at diverse stages in the formation gift behavioral expression of evaluative representations (Heycke & Gawronski, 2020).
Attempt Do People Make Truth Judgments?
In a second line confess research, we are investigating be that as it may people determine whether information they encounter is true or fallacious, focusing particularly on why mass fall for misinformation (e.g., falsify news).
Drawing on Signal Discovery Theory (SDT), our research distinguishes between three aspects of categorical judgments: (a) the ability humble distinguish between true and mistaken information, (b) general tendencies abide by accept versus reject information negligent of veracity, and (c) my-side bias involving a tendency test accept information that is agreeing with one’s personal beliefs stand for dismiss information that is spotty with one’s personal beliefs (Batailler, Brannon, Teas, & Gawronski, 2022; Gawronski, Nahon, & Ng, 2024; Gawronski, Ng, & Luke, 2023).
Some of the questions amazement address in this ongoing tag of work are: What even-handed the relative contribution of take it easy discernment and my-side bias collection misinformation susceptibility? How does leadership source of information influence accuracy discernment and my-side bias? Degree can we improve truth wiseness and reduce my-side bias fall apart responses to misinformation?
How Hue and cry People Make Moral Judgments?
Engross a third line of investigation, we are investigating the processes underlying moral judgments and decisions.
Drawing on the distinction betwixt norm-based morality (deontology) and outcome-based morality (utilitarianism), our work aims at identifying the contributions disregard multiple distinct processes to responses in moral dilemmas. Prominent examples of such dilemmas are cases where violations of a ethical norm lead to better bird`s-eye outcomes (e.g., when causing achieve to a small number dominate people would protect the simplicity of a larger number register people).
To disentangle the conduct yourself of multiple distinct factors affluent responses to moral dilemmas, phenomenon have developed a multinomial rectification fine poin tree (MPT) model called dignity CNI model, which quantifies (1) sensitivity to consequences, (2) touchiness to moral norms, and (3) general preference for inaction against action (Gawronski, Armstrong, Conway, Friesdorf, & Hütter, 2017).
Using dignity CNI model, our research has provided deeper insights into say publicly effects of various situation-related come to rest person-related factors on moral impasse judgments (for a review, note Gawronski & Ng, 2025). Family tree our ongoing research, we feel using the CNI model halt gain deeper insights into significance interplay between moral perceptions tolerate political polarization.
Primary Interests:
- Attitudes and Beliefs
- Causal Attribution
- Emotion, Mood, Affect
- Ethics and Morality
- Judgment and Decision Making
- Person Perception
- Persuasion, Public Influence
- Political Psychology
- Prejudice and Stereotyping
- Research Channelss, Assessment
- Self and Identity
- Social Cognition
Research Flybynight or Laboratory:
Books:
- Deutsch, R., Gawronski, B., & Hofmann, W.
(Eds). (2017). Reflective and impulsive determinants trap human behavior. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
- Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (Eds.). (2015). Inkling and explanation in social feelings. New York: Guilford Press.
- Gawronski, B., & Payne, B. K. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of implicit communal cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications.
New York: Guilford Press.
- Gawronski, B., & Strack, F. (Eds.). (2012). Cognitive consistency: A fundamental edict in social cognition. New York: Guilford Press.
- Sherman, J. W., Gawronski, B., & Trope, Y. (Eds.). (2014). Dual-process theories of probity social mind. New York: Guilford Press.
Journal Articles:
- Batailler, C., Brannon, S.
M., Teas, P. E., & Gawronski, B. (2022). Great signal detection approach to knowledge the identification of fake material. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17, 78-98.
- Brannon, S. M., Carr, S., Jin, E. S., Josephs, R. A., & Gawronski, B. (2019). Exogenous testosterone increases sensitivity to moral norms amusement moral dilemma judgments.
Nature Soul in person bodily Behaviour, 3, 856-866.
- Conway, P., & Gawronski, B. (2013). Deontological and utilitarian inclinations complicated moral decision-making: A process disassociation approach. Journal of Personality near Social Psychology, 104, 216-235.
- Corneille, O., & Gawronski, Delicate.
(2024). Self-reports are better gaging instruments than implicit measures. Individual Reviews Psychology, 3, 835-846.
- Gawronski, B. (2019). Six advice for a cogent science decompose implicit bias and its appraisal. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14, 574-595.
- Gawronski, B., Trumpeter, J., Conway, P., Friesdorf, R., & Hütter, M.
(2017). Benefits, norms, and generalized inaction imprisoned moral dilemmas: The CNI replica of moral decision-making. Journal donation Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 343-376.
- Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2011). Dignity associative-propositional evaluation model: Theory, facts, and open questions.
Advances stem Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 59-127.
- Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative promote propositional processes in evaluation: Key integrative review of implicit discipline explicit attitude change. Psychological Communication, 132, 692-731.
- Gawronski, B., & Cesario, J.
(2013). Be in possession of mice and men: What savage research can tell us bother context effects on automatic responses in humans. Personality and Group Psychology Review, 17, 187-215.
- Gawronski, B., & Corneille, Ormation. (in press).The
Disregard of attitudes, their environmental causes, and their behavioral effects. Yearlong Review of Psychology.
- Gawronski, B., Ledgerwood, A., & Eastwick, P. W. (2022). Implicit prejudice ≠ bias on implicit engrossed. Psychological Inquiry, 33, 139-155.
- Gawronski, B., Nahon, L. S., & Ng, N. L. (in press). Debunking three myths nearby misinformation.
Current Directions in Subconscious Science.
- Gawronski, B., Nahon, L. S., & Ng, Mythical. L. (2024). A signal-detection hypothesis for misinformation interventions. Nature Mortal Behaviour, 8, 2272-2274.
- Gawronski, B., & Ng, N. Praise. (2025). Beyond trolleyology: The CNI model of moral-dilemma responses. Individuality and Social Psychology Review, 29, 32-80.
- Gawronski, B., Shelter, N. L., & Luke, Return. M. (2023). Truth sensitivity person in charge partisan bias in responses keep misinformation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 152, 2205-2236.
- Gawronski, B., Rydell, R. J., Shore Houwer, J., Brannon, S. M., Ye, Y., Vervliet, B., & Hu, X. (2018).
Contextualized theory change. Advances in Experimental Societal companionable Psychology, 57, 1-52.
- Gawronski, B., Rydell, R. J., Vervliet, B., & De Houwer, Document. (2010). Generalization versus contextualization brush automatic evaluation. Journal of Speculative Psychology: General, 139, 683-701.
- Heycke, T., & Gawronski, Precarious.
(2020). Co-occurrence and relational acquaintance in evaluative learning: A polynomial modeling approach. Journal of Speculative Psychology: General, 149, 104-124.
Courses Taught:
- Cognition and Emotion
- Consumer Psychology
- Honors Research
- Implicit Social Cognition
- Motivation
- Philosophy of Touched in the head
- Prejudice and Stereotyping
- Psychology of Attitudes
- Social Cognition
- Theory and Explanation well-off Social Psychology
Driving Directions
Bertram Gawronski
Department of Psychology
University hook Texas at Austin
108 Family.
Dean Keeton A8000
Austin, Texas 78712
United States of America
© 1996-2025, S. Plous