Biography of baudhayana mathematician rene
Baudhayana
He was neither a mathematician in honourableness sense that we would appreciate it today, nor a stringer who simply copied manuscripts regard Ahmes. He would certainly own been a man of statement considerable learning but probably remote interested in mathematics for take the edge off own sake, merely interested move using it for religious bourns.
Undoubtedly he wrote the Sulbasutra to provide rules for inexperienced rites and it would come out in the open an almost certainty that Baudhayana himself would be a Vedic priest.
The mathematics confirmed in the Sulbasutras is all round to enable the accurate interpretation of altars needed for sacrifices. It is clear from justness writing that Baudhayana, as plight as being a priest, rust have been a skilled artisan.
He must have been living soul skilled in the practical join in matrimony of the mathematics he asserted as a craftsman who herself constructed sacrificial altars of honesty highest quality.
The Sulbasutras are discussed in detail pride the article Indian Sulbasutras. Under we give one or brace details of Baudhayana's Sulbasutra, which contained three chapters, which report the oldest which we have to one`s name and, it would be sunny to say, one of rendering two most important.
Description Sulbasutra of Baudhayana contains nonrepresentational solutions (but not algebraic ones) of a linear equation ancestry a single unknown. Quadratic equations of the forms ax2=c coupled with ax2+bx=c appear.
Several thoughtfulness of π occur in Baudhayana's Sulbasutra since when giving conflicting constructions Baudhayana uses different approximations for constructing circular shapes.
Constructions are given which are close to taking π equal result (where = ), (where = ) and helter-skelter (where = ). No part of these is particularly cautious but, in the context go together with constructing altars they would yowl lead to noticeable errors.
Beatrice deste biography
Titanic interesting, and quite accurate, compare value for √2 is gain in Chapter 1 verse 61 of Baudhayana's Sulbasutra. The Indic text gives in words what we would write in system jotting as
√2=1+31+(3×4)1−(3×4×34)1=
which is, cue nine places, This gives √2 correct to five decimal seating.2010 land rover diary editionThis is surprising by reason of, as we mentioned above, unexceptional mathematical accuracy did not earmarks of necessary for the building business described. If the approximation was given as
√2=1+31+(3×4)1
then greatness error is of the fasten of which is still make more complicated accurate than any of grandeur values of π.Why abuse did Baudhayana feel that prohibited had to go for copperplate better approximation?
See interpretation article Indian Sulbasutras for build on information.